Tuesday, June 05, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.9

I need a "Previously on Legion." If any television show needs a "previously on," it's Legion.

This episode is like a PSA for drugs. Parents, don't let your kids do drugs or they will end up like lazy, abandoned wives holding a grudge against their husbands who are trapped inside an ice cube.

I love Cary/Kerry.

Oh yeah! This is the episode that Lenny goes nuts and parties hard. I was looking forward to this one.

I'm no biologist, but I'm pretty sure you can't make a prince that way.

Thursday, May 24, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.8

As far as episodes go, this one was pretty straight forward for Legion. The plot seemed to move forward giving its characters a clear objective while unraveling a bit more of the mystery regarding Farouk's body's whereabouts. It really only had one side-tracked tangent about delusions in the middle of the episode, including the sweet-sweet voice of Jon Hamm telling us about people living in caves and watching society unravel through shadows on the walls.

The teaser for next week looks extremely interesting with Lenny being all Lenny like. More Aubrey Plaza is always appreciated.

Monday, May 21, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.7

Ostensibly on Legion.

What do the Amish building a barn have to do with moral panic?

Ah, not Amish, but pilgrims. And I see where you're going with this.

Did we run out of money and the sets are all just white backgrounds now?

Ha! He really is at the kiddie table.

I want to eat where there is a conveyor belt of entrees.

Did we know the mustache girls were robots? I don't remember them ever establishing that they are robots. Of course, I don't think I remember ever seeing more than three of them at a time. I just thought they were triplet females who wore mustaches (never thought I would type that in my lifetime).

Yeah, I don't really understand the tree as a computer thing. I'm confused.

Thursday, May 10, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.6

If multiple realities are really a thing, would we be the same person in each and its our surroundings that alter or would we have different personalities? Would we be victims of circumstance in each reality or would our different selves dictate the reality?

I knew that was a Clockwork Orange reference before the kids showed up. I recognized the camera shot when he walked into the tunnel.

Oh dear! But they put a much stranger twist on the scene than Kubrick did.

I thought I wanted to go back to corporate climbing David, but he turned out to be an a-hole.

I feel like I need to rewatch each episode immediately to fully understand what is being asked of me on a conceptual level. Maybe even watching the entire series again prior to each episode would help. This is my life now, watching Legion over and over again each week prior to every new episode. Quit my job, give up my 401K, pour everything I am into Legion. Sorry kids, daddy can't play with you today. He has to watch episode six of season one for the 37th time.

Tuesday, May 08, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.5

Not "Previously on Legion," but "Apparently on Legion." Nice!

I hate that little tar frog creature. It's creepy.

I don't even know what to say about that ending. Wow!

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.4

Was that one of those fake stage fires in the igloo?

Syd has some anger issues. Understandably so.

That is one of those fake stage fires! You'd think the production budget would be big enough to get a permit for a real fire on the set. Maybe the igloo was made of real ice and it couldn't withstand the heat. Or, and I can believe this in regard to this show, the decision to have a fake stage fire was purposeful.

Only took 55 minutes of a 60-minute program to get the opening credits.

There's Aubrey Plaza! Love her.

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.3

I'll try not to keep being a week late on these. They limited my Internet access at the office, so I am unable to post any longer at my work computer.

If Cary (the male) dies when Kerry (the female) is outside his body, does she die? Or does she then have to live a normal lifespan on her own? I feel like they covered this in season one, but I don't remember. What if he dies with her in him? Do they both die?

Aubrey Plaza deserves all the awards for this role. Just, whatever awards there are out there, back the truck up and give them to her. She is fantastic.

It is usually lazy writing to just simply solve a problem by saying, "I did a thing in your head." But it works here for some reason.

Uh, what? Not cool Legion. You can't just end there? I don't care that you are following up on this thread in a week. I don't want to wait a week.

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.2

I'm either getting acclimated to the oddities of this show or episode two took it easy on the psychedelic antics. Speaking of psychedelic antics, while watching this episode I started wondering about the correlation between the main characters of Legion and different drugs. Being that I've never taken part in a drug harder than liquor and cigarettes/cigars, I'm not exactly a leading expert in this area, but let's take a look at whether I can make this metaphor work.

Regarding our main hero, David Haller, and his counterpart, the Shadow King, they represent hallucinogens, such as LSD, also known as acid, trips, mushies, and tabs. Like their name suggests, hallucinogens produce hallucinations, which correlates pretty well with the telekinetic and telepathic abilities of David and the Shadow King.

Amphetamines, or speed, whizz, ice, and uppers, would be most associated with Cary Loudermilk, who is the brains of the operation. Amphetamines are a stimulant that speeds up certain chemicals in the brain and used to treat ADHD. In other words it helps you focus. Cary is a scientist focused on helping David cope with his multiple personalities and essential in solving many of the mysteries of the show.

Cary's counterpart, Kerry Loudermilk, would be the manifestation of cocaine, or coke, freebase, crack, Charlie, C, and rock. Cocaine produces a feeling of increased alertness and reduced fatigue. This makes me think of someone who is amped up and ready for a fight, which is most certainly the best way to describe Kerry. She is a mutant who lives inside Cary and can separate from his body when necessary, which is usually when a bit of muscle is needed.

As for cannabis, or marijuana, pot, weed, mull, leaf, and gunga, Sydney "Syd" Barrett is our girl. Syd is David's girlfriend and her mutant power is that she swaps minds with others for a temporary period. Because cannabis can be a depressant drug but also cause hallucinogenic and stimulant properties, Syd seems to represent this drug the most. Depending on the person (or cat in the case of this episode) she swaps with, her demeanor can change to reflect the person she is supposed to be imitating.

Lenny Busker is the epitome of ecstasy, also known as es, XTC, echoes, pills, and bickies. This drug has both stimulant and hallucinogenic properties. It is sometimes referred to as a psychedelic amphetamine, which Lenny is all too happy to embody, metaphorically.

Finally we have Melanie Bird. So far in season two she would represent heroine, or hammer, H, smack, horse, white, and beige. Heroine is a depressant that slows down the whole body, including breathing and heart rate. Thus far this season, all we've seen Melanie do is get high and lay in bed.

Again, I've never done a hard drug before in my life, so I really don't know if this is an accurate depiction of the characters and their drug counterparts. This is simply what I was contemplating while watching the episode, which is the point of these posts.

Thursday, April 05, 2018

(Not) Live (Not) Tweeting 'Legion' Episode 2.1

It's a new season for David and his mutant friends. That means another season of not live tweeting about Legion. Instead, I will post my collective thoughts after the show has aired and post it to the blog. So instead of live tweets, you are getting carefully constructed and thought-out blog posts.

It should be noted that if you haven't yet watched this week's episode, don't read on. Spoiler alert provided.

Jon Hamm!!! Voice-over narration by Jon Hamm. I'm already in love with the second season.

What is the cost of a single episode of this show? The production value is incredible. Sheesh!

Thanks Hamm. Now every crazy idea I ever have will be rendered in my mind as an oily mess of a stillborn chick.

I love the way Rachel Keller says, "He's my man." It's been used in a lot of the promos leading up to this season and there's something in her deliver and inflection that is solid.

What it must be like in the Legion writers' room: "Guys, we are really onto something, but you know what we need in this episode? A dance off!"

This show shouldn't exist. No network has executives smart or patient enough to let a show like this on the air. Let alone renew it for a second season.

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Roger Deakins Finally Gets His Due

One of the highlights of the 90th Academy Awards was cinematographer Roger Deakins finally winning his first Oscar after 14 nominations. Possibly the greatest cinematographer of our time had to sit through 12 previous ceremonies (he was nominated twice in 2007) and graciously applaud his rivals while seething on the inside. Yet, finally in 2017 he was able to photograph a film worthy of being a winner and that movie was Blade Runner 2049, which so far has been my favorite of the year.

I was curious what films Deakins worked to garner his previous nominations and what movies he lost out to. Here is a list of Deakins movies that earned a nomination and the men that ended up besting him.

1994
Deakins: The Shawshank Redemption
Winner: John Toll – Legends of the Fall

1996
Deakins: Fargo
Winner: John Seale – The English Patient

1997
Deakins: Kundun
Winner: Russell Carpenter – Titanic

2000
Deakins: O Brother, Where Art Thou?
Winner: Peter Pau – Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

2007
Deakins: The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and No Country for Old Men
Winner: Robert Elswit – There Will Be Blood

2008
Deakins: The Reader
Winner: Anthony Dod Mantle – Slumdog Millionaire

2010
Deakins: True Grit
Winner: Wally Pfister – Inception

2012
Deakins: Skyfall
Winner: Claudio Miranda – Life of Pi

2013
Deakins: Prisoners
Winner: Emmanuel Lubezki – Gravity

2014
Deakins: Unbroken
Winner: Emmanuel Lubezki – Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)

2015
Deakins: Sicario
Winner: Emmanuel Lubezki – The Revenant

It's a shame Deakins didn't win for several of these movies as they are beautifully shot. And it was especially upsetting that Skyfall didn't get it for him, but that is being a James Bond homer.

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Tidbits And Updates

Things have been quite busy lately with being short-staffed at work due to people being on vacation last week and my middle child, Jackson, starting tee-ball last weekend. His first game went much better than I was expecting. The horrific ideas I had going into it was that the team of 5-, 6-, and 7-year-olds would not know which way to run when, or even if, they hit the ball, no outs would ever come close to being made and it would be a cluster bomb of errors. It ended up being mostly that, but more manageable than I had foreseen happening.

Joanna got a new car a few weeks ago. She has needed a new car for awhile now, but we kept putting it off. I was hoping we would make it about another year before needing to make that purchase, however, the time was upon us and we found a good deal on what she had been eyeing. The impetus for buying the new car was that her registration/inspection was up and we were sure the Acura wouldn't pass. Not wanting to drop hundreds of dollars on the needed repairs to get her car to a passing grade, I elected to bite the bullet and get a new car instead. She now is driving around in a 2014 Honda Pilot, which the kids have christened Connie, that has all the amenities she was wanting, which included navigation system, heated seats, and DVD player (which I'm on record as still being against).

The 2018 baseball season begins in eight days. Joanna and I are doing our normal routine of taking the day off and watching the Texas Rangers season opener from home. We normally have an us day with breakfast at La Madeleine and sometimes catching a movie before first pitch. Occasionally, if the weather is permitting, I will play a round of disc golf as well. This year Jack says he wants to watch the game also, since he is getting into baseball a little bit more after playing his first tee-ball game. I'm normally not a fan of pulling a kid out of school for frivolous reasons, but I really love baseball and if it gets Jack motivated to play outside more then I am onboard with an early dismissal to watch the season opener.

Joanna and I celebrated our ninth wedding anniversary yesterday. I surprised her with flowers at her office. I don't get her flowers very often and it normally has to be some kind of special occasion when I do it. I have a big surprise in store for next year, but I haven't told many what it is and I still don't know all the details yet. It is driving Joanna crazy that I won't tell her what it is. I figure once I have ironed out all the details and we get closer to the actual event, then I will tell her.

I guess that is about it. Nothing too exciting really going on. Hopefully I have something of more relevance in the near future to write about. Until next time.

Sunday, February 25, 2018

The MCU Has Another Hit With Black Panther

For the second week in a row Marvel has won the box office with its 18th feature, Black Panther. It has garnered universal praise from critics and audiences alike. While I did really enjoy the movie, I do think it was a little over-hyped, but you have to wonder if there was any way it couldn't be. Black Panther isn't just the first African-American-led superhero movie for the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but most of its cast is made up of black actors from around the globe as well as several key crew members are black. This well-crafted film isn't just another multi-hundreds of millions of dollars project for Marvel, but something the African-American community has been anticipating for a very long time. And it ends up being something they should be extremely proud of as it is a spectacle to behold.

Here is my most recent rankings of the MCU with all 18 films included:

18. Iron Man 2
17. Thor: The Dark World
16. Captain America: The First Avenger
15. The Incredible Hulk
14. The Avengers
13. Iron Man 3
12. Avengers: Age of Ultron
11. Thor
10. Ant-man
9. Doctor Strange
8. Captain America: Civil War
7. Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol. 2
6. Black Panther
5. Thor: Ragnarok
4. Spider-man: Homecoming
3. Iron Man
2. Captain America: The Winter Soldier
1. Guardians of the Galaxy

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Tarantino Film Rankings

Several years ago a group of friends and I watched a handful of Quentin Tarantino movies as part of our film club. Being the quasi-cinephile of the group I was in charge of the selection process and the four picks we watched were Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs, and the Kill Bill double feature. The entire group had already seen Inglourious Basterds and The Hateful Eight had not yet been released.

At the time, my ranking of Tarantino's films from worst to best looked like this:

Kill Bill: Vol. 1
Death Proof
Jackie Brown
Kill Bill: Vol. 2
Django Unchained
Reservoir Dogs
Inglourious Basterds
Pulp Fiction

Last weekend my friend Danny and I were discussing Jackie Brown. He had recently watched Tarantino's third feature and liked it a lot. We talked about how I had left it off the film club's viewing lineup because of my disinterest in it. This conversation made me question what my most recent ranking would be of Tarantino's movies. With the release of The Hateful Eight, which I've seen twice, and a more recent viewing of Jackie Brown within the past year, I was able to reassess his nine films and make an updated list.

In addition to Danny having watched Jackie Brown igniting the fire to update my Tarantino directorial list, it was also prompted by the recent news that Tarantino has an idea for a new Star Trek movie. This will be the fourth film in the rebooted universe, labeled by many the J.J. Abrams-verse. Mark L. Smith, who penned The Revenant, has been brought on as the screenwriter. Paramount Pictures gave the green light for the project late last year and should everything work out we might have a new Tarantino film to include in his filmography that is part of an already-existing major studio franchise.

In regard to the current list, I've overlooked Four Rooms since Tarantino directed only one segment of the four. The most recent ranking, from worst to best, would be the following:

Death Proof
Jackie Brown
The Hateful Eight
Django Unchained
Kill Bill: Vol. 2
Kill Bill: Vol. 1
Inglourious Basterds
Reservoir Dogs
Pulp Fiction

There is certainly some change there from my initial arrangement. The Kill Bill movies got better with age and The Hateful Eight came in at a very low position. A minor alteration was Reservoir Dogs moving up one spot to become my second favorite.

A Tarantino-directed Star Trek film would be extremely weird so I have no idea how it would stack up against his other films. Yet, he hasn't really been a director that "stays in his lane" when it comes to genre.

Friday, December 15, 2017

Merry Star Wars!

In approximately 14 hours I will have bought a bag of popcorn and a soft drink, executed my pre-show bladder relief, and will be reclined and ready for the latest episode of the Star Wars saga. It's an exciting day to be alive!

I will then repeat the entire process Saturday morning for a repeat viewing with the family. Good times.

Friday, September 29, 2017

Great Directorial Debuts

History is littered with people who failed in endeavors prior to finding success.  Henry Ford, Bill Gates, and Walt Disney all had early businesses flop.  Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton both failed to reach their full potential early in life but eventually became synonymous with the term genius.  And Thomas Edison’s great claim to fame of inventing the lightbulb took 1,000 unsuccessful attempts before achieving success.

Those historic figures have provided countless educators and motivational speakers the needed rags-to-riches story that has inspired average people to aspire toward greatness, despite suffering setbacks and disappointments along the way.  In fact, it really isn’t all that interesting to hear of someone who intrinsically never faced obstacles on their way to victory, which may ultimately be the reason this post is a failure.  However, I wanted to look at directors whose first films were financial and critical successes.  It might be blind luck or it could be great source material/phenomenal cast and crews that lead to a great directorial debut, but let’s look at a few directors who triumphed with their first feature-length film.

Alex Garland inspired this post after watching his 2015 debut Ex Machina.  Garland benefitted from both a great story and superb acting from Oscar Isaac, Domhnall Gleeson, and Alicia Vikander.  The film was such a hit, it was recognized by the National Board of Review as one of the ten best independent films of the year, which the qualifier of “independent” isn’t really necessary as it is one of the best films of the year in general.  It also received the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects, beating out the big-budget movies The Martian, Mad Max: Fury Road, and Star Wars: The Force Awakens.  It also received an Academy Award nomination for Best Original Screenplay, and Vikander’s performance received BAFTA, Golden Globe, Empire, and Saturn award nominations.  The film was also nominated for and won countless additional awards, but one in particular that stands out is the BAFTA nomination Garland received for Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director, or Producer.

So what are some other great directorial debuts?  Let’s take a look at ten specific directors who saw initial success and see if a correlation can be found to predict the potential direction of Garland’s career.

District 9 (2009) – Neill Blomkamp
In 2009, South African-Canadian director, producer, screenwriter, and animator Neill Blomkamp hit the scene with a science-fiction film that could have been confused for a modern-day Star Trek episode in that the depictions of humanity, xenophobia, and social segregation were set against the backdrop of alien invaders being regulated to live in a South African ghetto.  The film, adapted from an earlier short film Blomkamp had done, was highly praised and won the 2010 Saturn Award for Best International Film.  It also received four Academy Award nominations for Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Visual Effects, and Best Editing.

Prior to District 9, Blomkamp made a handful of short films and since then has continued making thought-provoking science-fiction movies with 2013’s Elysium and 2015’s Chappie, but to less critical acclaim.  It was planned for Blomkamp to continue the Alien franchise with a sequel that would somewhat reboot the series and ignore the third and fourth installments, instead focusing on a direct sequel to James Cameron’s 1986 entry, Aliens.  However, those plans are currently on hold while Ridley Scott continues the prequel stories that began with 2012’s Prometheus and continued with Alien: Resurrection.  Untitled third and fourth films will be released later on.

The Shawshank Redemption (1994) – Frank Darabont
Despite ultimately receiving numerous Oscar nominations and becoming a quintessential must-see movie after countless broadcasts on TNT, Frank Darabont’s feature film directorial debut was considered a box-office bomb at the time.  It has even garnered such a (mainstream) cult following that many consider it to be the best film of 1994.  Along with its seven Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture, Actor, and Screenplay, it also received two Golden Globe nominations, two Screen Actor Guild nominations, a Writers Guild of America nomination, and Darabont also received a Directors Guild nomination.  The Shawshank Redemption has even become such a significant piece of cinema, in 2015 it was selected to the United States Library of Congress to be preserved in the National Film Registry.

Darabont’s career prior to 1994 was made up of directing a short film and a television movie.  Since directing The Shawshank Redemption, Darabont has gone on to helm The Green Mile, The Majestic, and The Mist, earning several accolades along the way.  He was also a creative force behind the earliest seasons of AMC’s The Walking Dead.

Dances with Wolves (1990) – Kevin Costner
Having appeared in a handful of forgetful movies, being known as “the unseen dead guy” in The Big Chill, and riding the popularity he had generated from The Untouchables, Bull Durham, and Field of Dreams, Kevin Costner bore the challenge of directing himself in 1990’s Dances with Wolves.  The gamble paid off though with Academy Awards for Best Picture, Director, Screenplay, Score, Editing, Cinematography, and Sound.  It also received nominations in the actor, supporting actor, supporting actress, art direction, and costume design categories.  Other nominations and awards include the BAFTAs, Golden Globes, numerous critics associations, and multiple guilds.

Unfortunately Costner didn’t stop while he was ahead.  He went on to star in several hit Hollywood films, but his directorial filmography is somewhat of a blemish on his career post-Dances with Wolves.  The list of movies Costner directed after his award-winning directorial debut includes The Postman and Open Range.  Only one of those is considered “fresh” on Rotten Tomatoes.

Ordinary People (1980) – Robert Redford
After 20 years of establishing iconic silver screen characters like the Sundance Kid, Jeremiah Johnson, Johnny Hooker, Jay Gatsby, and Bob Woodward, Robert Redford stepped behind the camera for 1980’s Ordinary People.  The career move resulted in four Oscars, including Best Picture, Director, Screenplay, and Supporting Actor, with two additional nominations, five Golden Globe awards, and several other accolades.

Redford’s directorial career has been made up of hits and misses, which is pretty normal for anyone who has nine directorial features under their belt.  The closest similar success to Ordinary People was 1994’s Quiz Show, which was up for Best Picture at the Academy Awards, along with The Shawshank Redemption.  Both would ultimately lose to Forrest Gump.  I should note that I consider Quiz Show to be a more enjoyable picture than Ordinary People, but that is just a personal preference opinion.

Mad Max (1979) – George Miller
With three short films under his belt, Australian filmmaker George Miller burst onto the scene with the first feature in a dystopian series by the name of Mad Max.  Not receiving the accolades others on this list have garnered, Mad Max was well received by critics from around the globe and did receive several nominations, and a few wins, from the Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts.  It has become a point of reference when discussing post-apocalyptic films and its 2015 sequel, Mad Max: Fury Road, also a Miller-helmed movie, would end up gathering ten Academy Award nominations that included the Best Picture category.

Miller’s directorial credits include all four Mad Max films, a portion of the Twilight Zone: The Movie, and a family friendly portion of his life that consists of Babe: Pig in the City and both Happy Feet pictures.  Although a release date has not yet been set, Miller has continuously teased the fifth Mad Max film, claiming it will be titled Mad Max: Fury Road.

Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966) – Mike Nichols
Considered an auteur director, Mike Nichols was able to get the best out of his actors, which is clearly evident in his first feature film, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?  Having made his start in theater and with multiple works on Broadway prior to 1966, Nichols acquired four Oscar-worthy performances from his four actors, with two of them winning their respective categories.  Along with the four acting nominations, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? also received nine other nominations, making it eligible in every category possible at the time of the ceremony.  This was a feat only accomplished one other time in Academy history, with 1931’s Cimarron.  The film also received seven Golden Globe nominations and three BAFTA awards.

Nichols certainly didn’t peak at the start of his career.  He went on to have a prolific career in both theater and Hollywood.  His films, which also include The Graduate, Catch-22, Silkwood, and Working Girl, have garnered a total of 42 and 56 Academy Award and Golden Globe nominations, respectively, and seven and 17 wins.

The 400 Blows (1959) – Francois Truffaut
Mike Nichols may have been considered an auteur filmmaker, but Francois Truffaut wrote the book on auteur cinema, or better said he wrote the essay on it.  Truffaut began his career as a film critic, and he took the critic part of the job very literally.  In 1954, Truffaut wrote an article condemning screenwriters and producers in the mainstream French cinema industry and after several years of publishing film analysis, directing a few short films along the way, and being inspired by Orson Welles’ Touch of Evil, he decided to make his feature-length directorial debut with The 400 Blows.

To say that Truffaut’s career started off well would be quite an understatement.  The 400 Blows wound up winning numerous awards, including the Best Director Award at the 1959 Cannes Film Festival, the Critics Award of the New York Film Critics’ Circle, and the Best European Film Award at 1960’s Bodil Awards.  It is also a film that holds the very rare 100% “Certified Fresh” rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

Truffaut went on to make 20 more films following The 400 Blows, only one of which, Fahrenheit 451, was filmed in English.  Many were well received and Truffaut is consistently in the conversation of most notable filmmakers of all time.

Marty (1955) – Delbert Mann
Directing more than 100 live television dramas prior to working in movies in 1955, Delbert Mann alternated between cinema and television throughout his career.  Whilst having a successful career that spanned 45 years, Mann is most certainly best known for winning the Best Director Academy Award and heading the production of a Best Picture winner with Marty.  Other Oscar accomplishments were Best Actor for Ernest Borgnine and Best Screenplay, as well as four other nominations.

Marty is another example of a 100% “Certified Fresh” film on Rotten Tomatoes and received extremely high praise upon its release.  It was also the winner of the Palme d’Or at Cannes Film Festival.  Despite the positive reviews and impressive accolades, Mann’s other films don’t really stand out as examples of the same impressive quality, with 1958’s Separate Table being the only real inspiring other work.

The Maltese Falcon (1941) – John Huston
One might consider directing one of the greatest film noir detective movies of all time as being the apex of a career, but John Huston was just getting started.  Huston transitioned from screenwriting to directing with The Maltese Falcon, which today is considered an all-time great movie, but it had already failed twice before at Warner Bros. Studios.  Huston was able to prove that third time really was a charm as his version has become a quintessential example of film noir, even being considered to be the first major film noir.

The Maltese Falcon was an immediate success, both financially and critically.  It went on to receive three Oscar nominations, include Best Picture, and was one of the initial inductees to the Library of Congress’ National Film Registry.

Huston’s career will likely always be linked to Humphrey Bogart since the two collaborated multiple times, but his filmography was made up of more than just Bogart hits.  Among Huston’s great films are The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, The Asphalt Jungle, The African Queen, Moulin Rouge, and Prizzi’s Honor.  He also had a short stint on the first big-screen adaptation of Ian Fleming’s Casino Royale, however, that movie ended up hiring five different directors, it’s a comedic spoof of the official James Bond film series, and it’s an unintelligible mess that I wouldn’t want anyone to suffer through.  I only included that fact since I am a James Bond fanatic.

Citizen Kane (1941) – Orson Welles
Any regular reader of this blog, or even friends of mine who don’t normally make it to this website, already knows the high praise I have for Orson Welles and Citizen Kane.  It’s the greatest movie ever made.  He was a visionary at the young age of 21.  Yada, yada, yada.  Instead of highlighting all the great things about Citizen Kane I will simply include a snippet of information about Welles’ career after his directorial debut.

Prior to making his feature film debut, Welles directed some short films and a silent short for a play.  Following Citizen Kane, Welles struggled to make another masterpiece, not due to lack of talent though.  Instead, his troubles came from meddling studios and a passion for the craft, even to a fault.  There were approximately 20 unfinished film projects Welles had worked on at one point or another at the time of his death.  That is seven more movies unfinished than completed that Welles either directed or co-directed, and none of his completed films ever made a profit upon their initial release.

Orson Welles is a fascinating character study, as much so as his fictional character Charles Foster Kane.  Although no other film has reached the pinnacle heights of master filmmaking that Citizen Kane did, the other movies that are widely considered to be successes include The Magnificent Ambersons, The Lady from Shanghai, Touch of Evil, and F for Fake.

Here is a list of some other impressive starts from first-time directors:
Primer (2004) – Shane Carruth
Reservoir Dogs (1992) – Quinten Tarantino (did a partially lost black-and-white amateur film prior; Tarantino himself referred to it as his film school)
This is Spinal Tap (1984) – Rob Reiner (did TV movies prior)
Diner (1982) – Barry Levinson (did a TV movie prior)
Caddyshack (1980) – Harold Ramis
Night of the Living Dead (1968) – George A Romero (did a single short film prior)
The Night of the Hunter (1955) – Charles Laughton (only directing credit; went uncredited for work on The Man on the Eiffel Tower [1949])

Thursday, September 21, 2017

Finally Got Around To Seeing The Newest Friendly Neighborhood Spider-man

Although he had been teased in a previous Marvel movie, Tom Holland's Spider-man got his own feature-length film earlier this year and Joanna and I finally made it to the theaters for a viewing.  Like when most movies in a series I enjoy are released, I make it a point to rank them in order of most enjoyable to most reviled.  In the case of Spider-man: Homecoming, it fell on the more favorable end of the list.

Before getting to my latest rankings of the Marvel Cinematic Universe movies, I should note that while I enjoy most of the films from Marvel Studios, I mostly prefer the DC characters.  That's not to say I fall in the camp of "DC is great and Marvel is horrible" that seems to run rampant in Internet comment sections, but when asked by my son Jack to start naming superheroes and villains I gravitate toward the DC cast of characters first.  The only real knowledge I have of Marvel characters is what I learn in my study prior to a new MCU film release.

Yet, despite finding the characters of DC more appealing to my adult tastes, the DC movies since they started trying to create their own cinematic universe has been pretty terrible.  I'll eventually get around to ranking the DC Cinematic Universe, but for now that list would consist of a few above average flicks with the remaining movies being incoherent mayhem put to celluloid.

Those previous two paragraphs were basically a longer way of saying that Marvel is doing a good job of making enjoyable popcorn movies that fit together nicely in their own world, but none have really stood out as anything that should be considered the greatest comic book inspired films of all time.  On with the list.

16. Iron Man 2
15. Thor: The Dark World
14. Captain America: The First Avenger
13. The Incredible Hulk
12. The Avengers
11. Iron Man 3
10. Avengers: Age of Ultron
9. Thor
8. Ant-man
7. Doctor Strange
6. Captain America: Civil War
5. Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol. 2
4. Spider-man: Homecoming
3. Iron Man
2. Captain America: The Winter Soldier
1. Guardians of the Galaxy

Wednesday, August 02, 2017

Overrating Or Selective Viewing

So far with 2017 more than halfway over, I have seen 12 movies released this calendar year.  It turns out that half of those I gave a rating of eight stars.  Another three received seven stars.  This leaves only three films left, which earned six stars, three stars, and two stars (oh how terrible the Alien and Underworld series have become).

Having a year with six, or even 10, films rated eight stars or higher isn't abnormal.  However, I still have Oscar season to get through, which likely means that another three or four will get some high ratings.  And that doesn't include the surprise standouts or great films I've also missed the past seven months.

This revelation has led me to believe that one of two things is happening.  Either I am overrating movies that are good, but not great, or I've become extremely good at picking out the great films to see and this is going to end up being an impressive year in film.  I'm hoping it is the latter.

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Bond 25 Updates

This week has been a good one in regard to the next production in the James Bond film franchise.  It was reported late yesterday that Bond 25, which is the current title for the film since an official title hasn't yet been announced, would be released into U.S. theaters on November 8, 2019, with British moviegoers getting the movie about a week earlier.  I've always wanted to see a Bond movie in Great Britain and my wife and I considered going for Spectre but it unfortunately didn't work out.  Maybe it will be Bond 25 that is the milestone film for me that I see for the first time on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.

Following the official announcement that Bond 25 would be released in late 2019, the New York Times is reporting that it is a done deal for Daniel Craig to return to the role for his fifth movie.  For a long time there have been rumors that Craig would return, but most of those were being reported by disreputable sources in tabloid magazines and newspapers.  Having a credible media outlet like the New York Times report Craig's return gives the long-standing rumors some validity.

Hopefully an official announcement is made soon and then we can start speculating on who the director will be, what the movie's title is, and whether they will continue the Blofeld/Spectre storyline.

Friday, July 07, 2017

A Brief Guide To The James Bond Actors

It has been more than 18 months since the release of Spectre and the speculation as to whether Daniel Craig will return to the role of James Bond has not stopped.  It seems every month about two or three new rumors emerge as to whether Craig will don the suit again or the producers have decided to move on to a new actor.  Although it's frustrating to not know one way or the other whether Craig will make a fifth 007 film (which I believe he will, and maybe even a possible sixth), I thought I would reflect on the six actors who have portrayed James Bond in the official series and what aspect of the character they brought to the silver screen.

First up is Sean Connery, who is the original Bond.  Connery was a tough spy, but also suave.  There is a story that 007 author Ian Fleming once said of Connery that he walked like a panther.

Second is George Lazenby, who is the one-film Bond.  Lazenby was a model who had never been in a movie, which the lack of experience shows a bit in the role.

Third is Roger Moore, who is the hammy Bond.  Moore didn't do his stunts, which is very obvious when you watch his movies, and he turned Bond into a silly film series.

Fourth is Timothy Dalton, who is the Shakespeare Bond.  Dalton attempted to bring the literary Bond character to the screen and make the man less of a superhero.  He was basically the Daniel Craig of the 1980s.

Fifth is Pierce Brosnan, who is the pretty-boy Bond.  Brosnan couldn't decide whether he wanted to be more of a Connery or more of a Moore.  He wanted to be serious, suave, and campy all at the same time.

Sixth is Daniel Craig, who is the gritty Bond.  Craig retconned the series in order to ground the movies and is the most physically fit of all the Bond actors.  He is basically the Daniel Craig of the 21st century.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Empire Magazine's 100 Greatest Films List Signifies A Sad State of Affairs

This month's issue of Empire includes the magazine's recent audience poll that resulted in the top 100 films of all time, and while there are certainly a few films that were placed precisely where they belong, the majority of the list is a reflection of short-term praise and recent box office success being an indicator of what is considered "greatest" by current audience members.

The highlights include The Godfather at the top of the list, The Shawshank Redemption, Pulp Fiction, Goodfellas, and Jaws also making the top 10, and having three Alfred Hitchcock films included (although I could make arguments that they are missing a few more).

However, there are three major issues I have with allowing "the people" to make this list.  My first matter of contention is with Citizen Kane being at 46.  I understand that today's movie-going audience doesn't really take the classics into consideration when coming up with the best movies of all time, which will be detailed a little further in my second point of frustration, but to regulate Orson Welles' masterpiece to the back of the top 50 is a crime.  It's become a cliché to say that Citizen Kane is the greatest movie of all time, and yet it truly is a seminal historical marker in the timeline of American cinema.  I get it not being a favorite, must-see movie for everyone, but its influence on modern moviemaking should still regulate it to the top 10.

My second argument against Empire's fan-favorite list is that it doesn't include a single silent film.  Again, this falls under today's generation of moviegoers not wanting to watch a medium that requires reading dialogue when they could simply watch a more modern film that has the dialogue spoken audibly, but there are plenty of silent films that deserve a spot on the top 100 list of greatest films.  Even rattling off the great ones, such as Metropolis, City Lights, The General, Birth of a Nation, Battleship Potemkin, and The Passion of Joan of Arc, would be a disservice to all the others that deserve consideration.  #silentfilmsmatter

And lastly, the comic book elephant in the room.  I understand that this is the era of the comic book movie and shared universes that combine superheroes to each other's films, but to claim that The Dark Knight is the third best movie ever made and three Marvel movies deserving spots ranging from as high as 34 to as low as 79 is just asinine.  The only comic book movie that deserves to be on a top 100 list of all time is The Dark Knight, I will give you that, but to say it is third overall is ludicrous.  There are still a lot of problems with the second of Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy that should set it back several spots on this list.  The reign of the geek is at an all-time high and has resulted in allowing four comic book movies to make its way onto this list, but by doing so it has done a great disservice to films of much greater quality and higher importance.

Luckily next month Empire is releasing another top 100 films list that will be put together by industry employees, so hopefully it will be a little more in line with what a top 100 greatest movies list should look like.  Obviously these lists are arbitrary and cannot be validated by a single person, but a list should have more weight behind it when it is made up by those who know what it takes to make a great film and the details lacking in a good, but not great one.