Since watching the sixth entry in the Fast and the Furious
franchise, I have had a huge question regarding the plot (I know, clean
storytelling in this film series is a lot to ask). Needless to say, if you haven’t seen the
movie and don’t want it spoiled, you probably don’t want to read any further.
Are you still here?
Okay then. We will proceed.
The finale of the movie takes place on an airstrip with cars
in pursuit of a massive cargo plane.
With stunt work, fistfights, car crashes, and explosions going on for
nearly 13 heart-thumping, adrenaline-fueled minutes, once the credits rolled
my first question to Joanna was, “Soooooooooo, how long was that runway?”
Apparently, I am not the only one that noticed the seemingly
endless amount of concrete that allowed for the breathtaking moments found
during the Fast & Furious 6 climax.
The Internet is littered with people ripping the movie for this exact
question, along with another ludicrous stunt that involves jumping across a
highway and catching a person in midair at 100 miles an hour (without even a
broken bone or fractured rib to show for it).
During the final action sequence, the cars and plane travel in excess of 100 mph for approximately
12-and-a-half minutes, resulting in countless, and sane, viewers wanting to scream out, “No
airstrip is this long!” Likely the only
reason they didn’t do so in the theater is that we save our condemnation for
stupid filmmaking for the Internet, where infuriated reviews belong. That way we don’t have to defend our opinions
with reasons or facts, but can simply let loose for 150 profanity-laced words
on a message board and there are no consequences to reckon with the next day.
Well, I pretty much let it go and chalked it up to poetic
license in order to ramp up the action for a film series known for preposterous
set pieces (i.e. dragging a safe the size of my dining room through Rio de
Janeiro). And I was willing to let
sleeping dogs lie, but then they had to continue on with the franchise and
after seeing Fast & Furious 7, I just had to look into this runway issue.
Like I mentioned before, I am not the only one who was
curious about how long of a runway would be needed to support the amount of
action that took place at the end of Fast & Furious 6. Pop culture website vulture.com even took a
crack at answering the question for those who were too lazy to do the actual
research. Their work can be seen here.
The problem with the linked article is that it doesn’t take
into account that some of the action overlaps for multiple characters. In fact, that brings us to the remarks made
by those who defend the film’s ending.
The most popular defense is, “People need to realize that a director has
to show so many things going on at the same time. If you viewed everything at the same time it
would show exactly what is happening all at once and extremely cut down the
length of time the plane was trying to take off.” Another way of wording that is from this
poster who stated, “The runway wasn’t long actually. LOL. When you put all the scenes of the different
actions together in real time it’s a total of about four minutes.” There is even a video on YouTube that
strengthens this point of view.
Another popular argument states, “All the complaints about
the runway and people are guessing how fast the plane was going. Until you know how fast it was going you
can’t prove the scene was unrealistic.”
While Vulture did get some of the facts wrong due to not overlapping
characters sharing the same actions at the same time during the movie, they did
provide some helpful scientific information.
Thanks to cast interviews and information from the president of the
Independent Pilots Association, we can calculate how fast the cars and plane
were traveling at different points during the scene. So with that information, and the research I did on my own with a repeated viewing of the film, I can safely calculate how fast the vehicles were traveling and how much distance the runway travels.
First I would like to thank Vulture for getting me the details regarding rate of speed, but knowing how fast
each character was traveling at any specific moment in the movie is only half
the problem. You must also figure out
how much screen time every character received. Below is a list of the characters (including
the plane itself as it gets some alone time during shots) and how much time
they spend during the movie’s climatic battle:
Dominic Toretto (Vin
Diesel) – 3 minutes, 12 seconds
Brian O’Conner (Paul
Walker) – 4 minutes, 6 seconds
Luke Hobbs (Dwayne
Johnson) – 3 minutes, 24 seconds
Letty Ortiz
(Michelle Rodriguez) – 3 minutes, 9 seconds
Mia Toretto (Jordana
Brewster) – 3 minutes, 54 seconds
Roman Pearce (Tyrese
Gibson) – 4 minutes, 34 seconds
Tej Parker (Chris
“Ludacris” Bridges) – 4 minutes, 36 second
Han (Sung Kang) – 3
minutes, 18.5 seconds (the half-second is because of slow-motion)
Gisele Yashar (Gal
Gadot) – 2 minutes, 49.5 seconds (again, slow motion caused a half-second)
Owen Shaw (Luke Evans)
– 2 minutes, 49 seconds
Riley Hicks (Gina
Carano) – 2 minutes, 12 seconds
Klaus (Kim Kold) – 1
minute, 40 seconds
Vegh (Clara Paget) –
1 minute, 22 seconds
Henchmen in Car 1 –
2 minutes, 36 seconds
Henchmen in Car 2 –
3 minutes, 24.5 seconds (the final participants during slow motion)
Pilots – 1 minute,
20 seconds
Plane – 1 minute, 22
seconds
The way I figured
this out was by renting the movie from Netflix and watching the finale,
stopping and starting each time a new character was introduced. I am very confident my calculations are
correct, but you are more than welcome to do the same and see if I have made an
error anywhere.
Going off the amount
of time each character is seen during the finale, it turns out Tej Parker has
the most screen time. Who would have
thought? To give the naysayers as much
benefit of the doubt as possible, we will assume that the longest possible time
it could have taken for the scene to unfold in real-time with everything
overlapping for every character would be 4 minutes and 36 seconds.
However, you can’t
simply take that number and multiply it out by a certain speed because during
the scene the plane is shown slowing down and speeding up. To break this down even further, I have used
the technical information from the Vulture article to show that Tej was
traveling at 100 mph when the plane comes into view, 115 mph once the plane
lands on the runway, 143 mph, which is the average speed of 115 mph and 172 mph
as those are the speeds of when the plane was coasting on the runway to the
minimum speed needed to take off, and finally 172 mph.
Tej was traveling 100
mph for a total of seven seconds at the beginning of the chase, 115 mph when
the plane lands on the runway for 19 seconds, 143 mph for 120 seconds (again
this is an average because the plane accelerated from 115 mph to 172 mph at a
continuous rate), and 172 mph for 124 seconds.
The final six seconds of screen time was coming to a braking halt at the
end of the runway. We will get into that
a little later.
Doing some
calculations to show how far Tej traveled during each moment of the chase, he
went 1,026.69 feet during the seven seconds he traveled 100 mph, 3,204.73 feet
at 115 mph, 25,167.6 feet at 143 mph, and 31,281.48 feet at 172 mph. This is a total distance of 60,680.5 feet
traveled.
Okay, so now we need
to add in the final six seconds of braking.
At 170 mph, which is how fast he was traveling when the plane came
crashing back down to the runway, he would have traveled a minimum of 690 feet
in order to come to a complete halt.
Since we are trying to come up with the shortest possible distance
traveled to give those defending the outlandishness of the scene every benefit
of the doubt, we will assume that is all that he traveled.
Adding in the 690
feet, we have a total of 61,370.5 feet.
Again, benefit of the doubt, I won’t even include any additional feet of
runway, despite not knowing exactly where the runway began and seeing that
there was about an additional 150 feet of concrete before a dead end once the
cars came to a stop. I could probably add about 500 more feet, but I think without it I will still prove my point.
The minimum amount
of runway you would need to complete the scene shown in Fast & Furious 6
was 61,370.5 feet. That means the plane
traveled a little more than 11 miles before stopping. According to Wikipedia, the longest runway in
the world is Edwards Air Force Base in the United States. It comes in at 39,600 feet, or 7.5 miles. You’ve been scienced Fast & Furious
lover.
Analysis:
I mostly did this
study in film editing because I wanted to know for sure whether the amount of
time during the climactic finale and the distance traveled during that time was
excessively long or if it was just my imagination and biased animosity toward
the franchise, but I also put in the time and effort for another reason. That was to point out the flaws in fashioning
an action scene like the one at the end of Fast & Furious 6 that drags on
for nearly a quarter of an hour. Not
only did you defy the normal parameters of physics and logic, but the problem also
becomes that it takes the viewer out of the story because of the absurdity of
the storytelling.
By having multiple
characters and so many different storylines going on simultaneously, the audience
becomes overwhelmed and eventually gets bored with the excessiveness. Michael Bay’s Transformers series runs into
the same problem in that by the time you get to the finale, you have seen robot
aliens beating up on one another for three hours and you just don’t care any
longer. We become desensitized to the conflict
after a certain point and our mind starts wandering to other points of
interest.
That’s not to say an
action scene cannot go on for more than 10 minutes without letting up at some
point, but there needs to be a sense of realism going on (if the film is supposed to be based in reality) and there has to be characters we care about. After 12 hours of fast cars and furiously bad
acting, most members of the audience don’t give a flip about the Toretto gang
or why it is they are battling these villains in and outside of a cargo plane.
But thanks to some
hard work and head-hurting calculations, we definitely know that there is not a
runway in the world that would have supported that action sequence.
No comments:
Post a Comment