Monday, October 28, 2013

Kubrick Completed, Scorsese Starts

My Friday night movie club has made it through the first director and will be moving on to the second in less than two weeks.  Stanley Kubrick was a mixed bag for those in attendance.  Evan enjoyed and was appreciative of the films Kubrick made, but didn't necessarily intend to watch some of them again (ever), while Danny's opinion was more varied and what he didn't like he REALLY didn't like.
The next director on our horizon is Martin Scorsese.  The films we will be viewing are Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, The Color of Money (with the possibility of viewing The Hustler before it as a view to see how Scorsese handled a sequel to a film he had no association with), Goodfellas, Casino, Gangs of New York, The Aviator, The Departed, and Shutter Island.  By the time we finish Scorsese, his new movie The Wolf of Wall Street, will likely be in release and we can take a field trip to the cinema.
Following the viewing of half of Kubrick's films in the past few weeks, I have ranked his entire filmography again.  There was a minor change to the order since this was completed a few years ago.  The new order is below:

13. Fear and Desire
12. Eyes Wide Shut
11. Barry Lyndon
10. Killer's Kiss
9. Lolita
8. Spartacus
7. Full Metal Jacket
6. A Clockwork Orange
5. The Shining
4. Paths of Glory
3. The Killing
2. 2001: A Space Odyssey
1. Dr. Strangelove

Thursday, October 24, 2013

The Appreciation Of Citizen Kane

In continuing our film club we have decided between the viewing of Stanley Kubrick and the following director, Martin Scorsese, we will do a one-off film and watch Citizen Kane.  Mostly this is because Orson Welles’ directorial debut film is considered the greatest of all time and through the years I have gotten into several discussions/arguments with the casual moviegoer about the validity of this claim.  I decided it is time to put down on paper, like many movie reviewers and film aficionados, why Citizen Kane garners the attention it does.
I will admit, having to defend this movie as the greatest of all time is a bit of an annoyance, especially since the conversation started up just the other night at a card game, because most of the people who disagree with the claim of Citizen Kane being the best haven’t seen a movie ever made prior to Star Wars, which was released in 1977.  Maybe semantics is the root of the problem when trying to understand how important of a film Citizen Kane truly is.  It certainly isn’t the most entertaining in the history of cinema.  Maybe when people call it the greatest of all time, really they should be stating it was the most important, most innovative and most progressive of all time.  Without Kane, movies as we see them today wouldn’t exist.  Welles and his team of filmmakers put in place several of the modern-day conventions that we take for granted in movies.  This includes visual trickery and non-linear storytelling.
The most groundbreaking achievement of Citizen Kane was the development of “deep focus.”  Welles and cinematographer Gregg Toland came up with the ability to keep the entire image onscreen in focus, from the foreground all the way to the background.  Experimentation was done in order to allow the viewer to watch, like a human eye does, action in the foreground, background, and everything in between at leisure.  Prior to this, the camera would focus on one spot and anything too close or too far away from the lens was blurred out.
When deep focus was not available to use, Toland would trick the viewer with matte shots and images seen through optical printers, or layering one piece of film onto another.  Matte shots were utilized by shooting the foreground with the background darkened and then rewinding the film and shoot the background action with the foreground blackened.
Another forward-thinking advancement was in how Welles framed the shot.  Prior to Citizen Kane, most American directors and cinematographers were utilizing the “proscenium arch” method, which, like with a theatre stage the proscenium arch being the arch over the stage in the theater, all action was presented like on a stage.  While the practice was common in German Expressionist films, in America low- and high-angle camera shots were not used, however, Welles and Toland placed the camera in different locations to emphasize the dramatic toll of a scene.  This technique resulted in allowing ceilings to be shown.  As films primarily shot on sound stages at the time and location filming was not as common as today, it was not possible to use a low-angle shot as the lack of a ceiling would be realized.  Welles used a muslin drape above the set and hid the boom microphones above the cloth.  He would even dig trenches into the floor in order to exaggerate the effect of his low-angle shot.
Part special effects, part impressive camerawork is the scene where the camera in the opera house rises dramatically to the rafters.  This was achieved by craning the camera upward over the performance scene, inserting a camera wipe to a miniature of the upper regions of the house, and then inserting another camera wipe matching the first one to bring in the scene of the workmen.  That sort of cinematography was not commonplace at the time Welles and Toland executed it.  Yet, today’s audience would laugh at the idea of attempting this sort of trickery since executing this type of shot would simply be pulled off with computer imagery.
The story-telling practices of Citizen Kane were unique.  While not completely pioneering the use of flashback, Welles and screenwriter Herman J. Mankiewicz enhanced the practice and masterfully spun a tale that allowed numerous characters to divulge the plot through conflicting, and sometimes murky, points of view.  The idea of this type of storytelling was felt to be too complicated for moviegoers and studio chiefs were afraid to allow it.  The idea to use multiple narrators with their versions of events partly overlapping was unheard of at the time in Hollywood.
Another storytelling technique Welles and Mankiewicz utilized was montage, by collapsing time and space into a short block of images.  The most prominent of these is the two-minute mealtime montage that spans 16-years of a crumbling marriage.
Welles was not only a pioneer in what was seen on the screen, but what was being heard as well.  The rain falling against a window outside the cabaret, echoes in a marble-lined library, and overlapping voices and dialogue gave the scenes an additional breath of life that visuals alone could not do.  According to French filmmaker Francois Truffaut, “Before Kane, nobody in Hollywood knew how to set music properly in movies.  Kane was the first, in fact the only, great film that uses radio techniques.”  It was these radio techniques that accentuated the drama of each scene.  Welles also believed the overlapping of dialogue was more realistic than what the conventional stage and film traditions of the time were, which believed characters shouldn’t step on one another’s lines.
Welles also pioneered an aural skill known as “lightning-mix,” which is used to link montage sequences with a specific sound or phrase.  By utilizing the lightning-mix, Welles was able to connect what would have been random rough cuts into a smooth narrative storyline.  And yet another innovation of the legendary filmmaker was the J-cut, which would put the audio ahead of the visual in scene transitions resulting in a scene coming to a close and the audio transitioning the viewer to the next scene prior to any visuals being perceived.
The final bit of improvement cinema has experienced thanks to Citizen Kane is the use of what Bernard Herrmann described as “radio scoring.”  At the time, Hollywood movies were scored with a non-stop musical soundtrack.  Herman avoided this practice by inserting musical cues lasting between five and 15 seconds to bridge a scene or elicit an emotional response.  Again, this is something modern-day viewers take for granted because they know nothing different.
It is for all of these reasons Citizen Kane repeatedly tops lists regarding the greatest films of all time.  I propose to you that if you watch a handful of movies made prior to Citizen Kane and then view Welles’ masterpiece, an understanding will be gained of why it amasses the praise it does.  You may not fall in love with its story, which if you study the behind-the-scenes making of it and how it relates to real-life media mogul William Randolph Hearst you would not be quite so jaded, but you will have to appreciate what it did to progress cinema as an art form and as a visual storytelling medium.