It was revealed this weekend that shooting of the latest
James Bond movie was to commence on December 6 and a British release date of October
23, 2015, was still on schedule, with the U.S. release of the latest 007
picture to take place two weeks later.
Sam Mendes will return to the helm of Bond 24 and it has been rumored
that the script, which is being fine-tuned in order to add some humor, will
continue the themes that were explored in Skyfall. With the Mendes-Daniel Craig team-up
garnering Bond producers more than one billion dollars in ticket sales in 2012,
it is no wonder they do not want to shake things up too much with the next
film.
While scouring the Internet for information about this
announcement, I began reading the comments section on a particular website
(which is never a good idea) and the standard bickering in regard to the Bond
series quickly got under way. The two topics
of disagreement among Bond fans that garner the most attention are whether Skyfall is overrated and how Bond movies
should get back to its roots in gadgets and laughs. The specific statement that sent me into
research mode is below in its unedited version.
It was in response to a commenter stating that Skyfall was a terrible film and only did well financially because
of critics’ response. The commenter’s
first paragraph, which is not included, was spot on about how critical analysis
usually has no bearing on whether a movie is going to make money since critics
have lambasted Michael Bay movies for years and they keep making billions at
the box office but the award show darlings the reviewers love become
flops. However, it is the second part of
his response that is very wrong. Here it
is:
“Lastly the old james
bond you love and want to see is the reason the franchise was doing poorly
before Daniel Craig re invented its success. Go ahead and look at the numbers
for bond films pre craig, kept getting worse and worse numbers hence why we
didn’t have any for a long time until Craig came along and rebooted it. I
respect your a real bond fan but it seems like you just want the same thing
over and over, which is exactly why it got stale and needed new life. If the
old format was working and MOST OF ALL MAKING MONEY the nit wouldn’t have
changed, fact!”
Ignoring the poor
grammar, his idea that the series had become stale and needed a fresh look is
absolutely correct. However, the first
part of that paragraph couldn’t be more wrong.
The pre-Craig era, specifically the Pierce Brosnan films, were doing just
fine fiscally. Brosnan’s four films
started strong, with Goldeneye making
$352 million internationally, but then Tomorrow
Never Dies dipped slightly down to $333 million. The next two films saw increases with each
release, The World is not Enough
making $361 million and Die Another Day
$431 million.
Those numbers are
quite formidable compared to Brosnan’s predecessor, Timothy Dalton, where License to Kill and The Living Daylights brought in $191 million and $156 million,
respectively. Even with higher
production budgets than the Dalton films, and in some cases the budget
increased by $100 million, and inflation being taken into consideration, the
profits were still higher in the 1990s with Brosnan’s portrayal of the British
superspy.
What does all this
mean? Why am I attempting to discredit
an anonymous website commentator that I have no previous interaction with? Is this all a waste of time and computer
space? The answers to those questions
are probably “I don’t know,” “Just because,” and “Absolutely,” all in that
order. But I am bored at work and this
has given me some sort of purpose for the past two hours.
Despite the fact Brosnan’s
final outing as 007 was a gigantic success money-wise, the series needed to
take a different direction. The gadgets
were running rampant and the set pieces had become so over the top that
producers couldn’t bring things back down to reality with Brosnan still in the
lead. The Daniel Craig era, which has
been grittier in tone and replicated the fast-paced action of the Jason Bourne film
series, has been a massive triumph.
Audiences have embraced the blond Bond, resulting in two of the most
financially successful movies of the series.
No comments:
Post a Comment